IN NUMBERS: Why jeepney phaseout is anti-poor, will do little for environment MAR 6, 2023 3:25 PM PHT RALF RIVAS MANILA, Philippines – The Philippine government’s move to force jeepney drivers to shift to the more environment-friendly, modern jeepney has faced backlash over its anti-poor terms. The Land Transportation Franchising and Regulatory Board (LTFRB) is forcing drivers and operators to use an electric vehicle or a combustion engine that complies with a Euro IV emission standard, as prescribed by the Department of Environment and Natural Resources to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, toxic fumes, and other forms of air pollution. But here are some numbers that show that the government’s modernization plan is clunky at best: JEEPNEYS COMPRISE ONLY 2% OF THE TOTAL REGISTERED VEHICLES IN THE PHILIPPINES According to data from the Department of Energy and LTFRB, there are over 9 million registered vehicles in the Philippines. Of the total, jeepneys comprise only over 250,000. Of the total jeepneys, around a quarter operate in Metro Manila. JEEPNEYS AND OTHER PUBLIC UTILITY VEHICLES CONTRIBUTE 15% OF THE TOTAL PARTICULATE MATTER EMISSIONS IN MANILA While jeepneys play an important role in providing services in the country, a study by the Blacksmith Institute and Clean Air Asia found that diesel-powered jeepneys contribute 15% of the total particulate matter emissions in Metro Manila. The Center for Energy, Ecology and Development (CEED) argued that air pollution reduction efforts “would be negligible if modernization efforts focused on jeepneys compared to private vehicles.” “Not to mention, private car owners would also be more likely financially capable of modernizing their vehicles,” CEED said. Jeepneys are mostly fitted with imported, second-hand engines which have higher emissions than modern diesel technologies. The study also found that the majority of jeepney owners own only one unit, making it difficult for them to save on costs and properly maintain vehicles. 1,766.7% THE MODERN JEEPNEY IS 1,766.7% MORE EXPENSIVE THAN THE TRADITIONAL JEEPNEY A traditional jeepney costs around P150,000 to P250,000. A modern e-jeepney would force drivers and operators to cough up as much as P2.8 million, a 1,766.7% increase in cost. 5.7% THE GOVERNMENT’S PROPOSED SUBSIDY COVERS ONLY 5.7% OF THE TOTAL COST The LTFRB said that a subsidy of P160,000 will be provided. This is only 5.7% of the total cost of the modern jeepney. Rappler was able to talk to some jeepney drivers who said that they earn around P2,000 per day. Should they upgrade to modern jeepneys, they would need to earn at least P3,500 to pay off their debt. The LTFRB insists only operators who have consolidated into either a cooperative or corporation will be allowed to operate. Jeepney drivers fear that the program would eventually phase out their units and require them to buy new modernized jeeps that they can’t afford. PROTEST. Transport workers and other protest groups stage a program at the Mendiola Peace Arch, during the start of a week-long transport strike against the government’s plan to phase out jeepneys, on March 6, 2023. Alecs Ongcal/Rappler Past efforts Before the PUV modernization push, several programs had been explored in the past but failed. In 2007, the DENR explored the replacement of old engines used in jeepneys with new engines. Mitsubishi UFJ Securities and the University of the Philippines-National Center for Transportation Studies were asked to come up with a proposal. They found that new engines cost P300,000. But the plan failed as the program needed additional public and private funding. In 2011, liquefied petroleum gas or LPG jeepneys were launched. By using LPG engines, jeepneys became Euro III-compliant. However, this also failed since the engine and transmission components cost P350,000 and LPG stations were limited. In 2008, the first electric jeepneys were introduced in Makati City through the Institute for Climate and Sustanable Cities and the Philippine Utility Vehicle. Limitations in battery capacity limited these e-jeepneys to shorter routes. MUST READ Marcos’ broken promise: Why jeepney drivers protest modernization Marcos’ broken promise: Why jeepney drivers protest modernization Just transition During the 19th Congress, former Manila 1st District representative Manuel Luis Lopez filed a just transition bill that aimed to shift drivers to e-vehicles with sufficient financial support from government. His proposal included the following: Vehicle subsidy – The Department of Transportation (DOTr) will provide financial assistance to drivers and operators not lower than 50% of the cost per unit of modern jeepneys. Fuel subsidy – The DOTr will pay a portion of the fuel consumed by affected drivers on a bi-weekly basis. Concessional loan – A tripartite mechanism including the government, financial institutions, and transport workers will establish a loan program. The interest rate will not excee

See also What Is My Advocacy In My Country And My Younger Generation Achieve Sustai...

I understand that you are presenting an article discussing the concerns regarding the jeepney phaseout in the Philippines. The article highlights several numbers to support the claim that the phaseout may be anti-poor and ineffective in addressing environmental concerns. Here are the numbers mentioned in the article:

1. Jeepneys comprise only 2% of the total registered vehicles in the Philippines: According to data from the Department of Energy and LTFRB, out of over 9 million registered vehicles in the Philippines, there are only around 250,000 jeepneys.

2. Jeepneys and other public utility vehicles contribute 15% of the total particulate matter emissions in Manila: A study by the Blacksmith Institute and Clean Air Asia found that diesel-powered jeepneys contribute 15% of the total particulate matter emissions in Metro Manila. The study argues that focusing on jeepneys alone for modernization may have limited impact compared to private vehicles.

3. The modern jeepney is 1,766.7% more expensive than the traditional jeepney: A traditional jeepney costs around P150,000 to P250,000, while a modern e-jeepney would cost as much as P2.8 million, resulting in a significant increase in cost.

4. The government’s proposed subsidy covers only 5.7% of the total cost: The LTFRB stated that a subsidy of P160,000 would be provided, which accounts for only 5.7% of the total cost of a modern jeepney.

The article also mentions previous efforts and alternative proposals that have been explored, including engine replacement, LPG jeepneys, and electric jeepneys, but faced limitations and challenges.

It is important to note that these numbers and arguments are presented from the perspective of the article and may not encompass the full range of viewpoints on the issue. The jeepney phaseout and its impact on different stakeholders are complex topics with multiple considerations, including environmental sustainability, public transportation efficiency, and socioeconomic factors.
See also Mickey On A Rail Way Picking Up Stones Down Came An Ingine And Broke Mickeys...

Question

IN NUMBERS: Why jeepney phaseout is anti-poor, will do little for environment MAR 6, 2023 3:25 PM PHT RALF RIVAS MANILA, Philippines – The Philippine government’s move to force jeepney drivers to shift to the more environment-friendly, modern jeepney has faced backlash over its anti-poor terms. The Land Transportation Franchising and Regulatory Board (LTFRB) is forcing drivers and operators to use an electric vehicle or a combustion engine that complies with a Euro IV emission standard, as prescribed by the Department of Environment and Natural Resources to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, toxic fumes, and other forms of air pollution. But here are some numbers that show that the government’s modernization plan is clunky at best: JEEPNEYS COMPRISE ONLY 2% OF THE TOTAL REGISTERED VEHICLES IN THE PHILIPPINES According to data from the Department of Energy and LTFRB, there are over 9 million registered vehicles in the Philippines. Of the total, jeepneys comprise only over 250,000. Of the total jeepneys, around a quarter operate in Metro Manila. JEEPNEYS AND OTHER PUBLIC UTILITY VEHICLES CONTRIBUTE 15% OF THE TOTAL PARTICULATE MATTER EMISSIONS IN MANILA While jeepneys play an important role in providing services in the country, a study by the Blacksmith Institute and Clean Air Asia found that diesel-powered jeepneys contribute 15% of the total particulate matter emissions in Metro Manila. The Center for Energy, Ecology and Development (CEED) argued that air pollution reduction efforts “would be negligible if modernization efforts focused on jeepneys compared to private vehicles.” “Not to mention, private car owners would also be more likely financially capable of modernizing their vehicles,” CEED said. Jeepneys are mostly fitted with imported, second-hand engines which have higher emissions than modern diesel technologies. The study also found that the majority of jeepney owners own only one unit, making it difficult for them to save on costs and properly maintain vehicles. 1,766.7% THE MODERN JEEPNEY IS 1,766.7% MORE EXPENSIVE THAN THE TRADITIONAL JEEPNEY A traditional jeepney costs around P150,000 to P250,000. A modern e-jeepney would force drivers and operators to cough up as much as P2.8 million, a 1,766.7% increase in cost. 5.7% THE GOVERNMENT’S PROPOSED SUBSIDY COVERS ONLY 5.7% OF THE TOTAL COST The LTFRB said that a subsidy of P160,000 will be provided. This is only 5.7% of the total cost of the modern jeepney. Rappler was able to talk to some jeepney drivers who said that they earn around P2,000 per day. Should they upgrade to modern jeepneys, they would need to earn at least P3,500 to pay off their debt. The LTFRB insists only operators who have consolidated into either a cooperative or corporation will be allowed to operate. Jeepney drivers fear that the program would eventually phase out their units and require them to buy new modernized jeeps that they can’t afford. PROTEST. Transport workers and other protest groups stage a program at the Mendiola Peace Arch, during the start of a week-long transport strike against the government’s plan to phase out jeepneys, on March 6, 2023. Alecs Ongcal/Rappler Past efforts Before the PUV modernization push, several programs had been explored in the past but failed. In 2007, the DENR explored the replacement of old engines used in jeepneys with new engines. Mitsubishi UFJ Securities and the University of the Philippines-National Center for Transportation Studies were asked to come up with a proposal. They found that new engines cost P300,000. But the plan failed as the program needed additional public and private funding. In 2011, liquefied petroleum gas or LPG jeepneys were launched. By using LPG engines, jeepneys became Euro III-compliant. However, this also failed since the engine and transmission components cost P350,000 and LPG stations were limited. In 2008, the first electric jeepneys were introduced in Makati City through the Institute for Climate and Sustanable Cities and the Philippine Utility Vehicle. Limitations in battery capacity limited these e-jeepneys to shorter routes. MUST READ Marcos’ broken promise: Why jeepney drivers protest modernization Marcos’ broken promise: Why jeepney drivers protest modernization Just transition During the 19th Congress, former Manila 1st District representative Manuel Luis Lopez filed a just transition bill that aimed to shift drivers to e-vehicles with sufficient financial support from government. His proposal included the following: Vehicle subsidy – The Department of Transportation (DOTr) will provide financial assistance to drivers and operators not lower than 50% of the cost per unit of modern jeepneys. Fuel subsidy – The DOTr will pay a portion of the fuel consumed by affected drivers on a bi-weekly basis. Concessional loan – A tripartite mechanism including the government, financial institutions, and transport workers will establish a loan program. The interest rate will not excee

See also What Is My Advocacy In My Country And My Younger Generation Achieve Sustai...

I understand that you are presenting an article discussing the concerns regarding the jeepney phaseout in the Philippines. The article highlights several numbers to support the claim that the phaseout may be anti-poor and ineffective in addressing environmental concerns. Here are the numbers mentioned in the article:

1. Jeepneys comprise only 2% of the total registered vehicles in the Philippines: According to data from the Department of Energy and LTFRB, out of over 9 million registered vehicles in the Philippines, there are only around 250,000 jeepneys.

2. Jeepneys and other public utility vehicles contribute 15% of the total particulate matter emissions in Manila: A study by the Blacksmith Institute and Clean Air Asia found that diesel-powered jeepneys contribute 15% of the total particulate matter emissions in Metro Manila. The study argues that focusing on jeepneys alone for modernization may have limited impact compared to private vehicles.

3. The modern jeepney is 1,766.7% more expensive than the traditional jeepney: A traditional jeepney costs around P150,000 to P250,000, while a modern e-jeepney would cost as much as P2.8 million, resulting in a significant increase in cost.

4. The government’s proposed subsidy covers only 5.7% of the total cost: The LTFRB stated that a subsidy of P160,000 would be provided, which accounts for only 5.7% of the total cost of a modern jeepney.

The article also mentions previous efforts and alternative proposals that have been explored, including engine replacement, LPG jeepneys, and electric jeepneys, but faced limitations and challenges.

It is important to note that these numbers and arguments are presented from the perspective of the article and may not encompass the full range of viewpoints on the issue. The jeepney phaseout and its impact on different stakeholders are complex topics with multiple considerations, including environmental sustainability, public transportation efficiency, and socioeconomic factors.

See also Mickey On A Rail Way Picking Up Stones Down Came An Ingine And Broke Mickeys...

soundcheck · Answer

I understand that you are presenting an article discussing the concerns regarding the jeepney phaseout in the Philippines. The article highlights several numbers to support the claim that the phaseout may be anti-poor and ineffective in addressing environmental concerns. Here are the numbers mentioned in the article:1. Jeepneys comprise only 2% of the total registered vehicles in the Philippines: According to data from the Department of Energy and LTFRB, out of over 9 million registered vehicles in the Philippines, there are only around 250,000 jeepneys.2. Jeepneys and other public utility vehicles contribute 15% of the total particulate matter emissions in Manila: A study by the Blacksmith Institute and Clean Air Asia found that diesel-powered jeepneys contribute 15% of the total particulate matter emissions in Metro Manila. The study argues that focusing on jeepneys alone for modernization may have limited impact compared to private vehicles.3. The modern jeepney is 1,766.7% more expensive than the traditional jeepney: A traditional jeepney costs around P150,000 to P250,000, while a modern e-jeepney would cost as much as P2.8 million, resulting in a significant increase in cost.4. The government's proposed subsidy covers only 5.7% of the total cost: The LTFRB stated that a subsidy of P160,000 would be provided, which accounts for only 5.7% of the total cost of a modern jeepney.The article also mentions previous efforts and alternative proposals that have been explored, including engine replacement, LPG jeepneys, and electric jeepneys, but faced limitations and challenges.It is important to note that these numbers and arguments are presented from the perspective of the article and may not encompass the full range of viewpoints on the issue. The jeepney phaseout and its impact on different stakeholders are complex topics with multiple considerations, including environmental sustainability, public transportation efficiency, and socioeconomic factors.

J-Net USA

IN NUMBERS: Why Jeepney Phaseout Is Anti-poor, Will Do Little For Environm…

Related Articles